Hi :)
T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Okie, now you've got me upset and jealous at the same time. The 100/2.8 is
a nice lens - it (or should I say "he"? a peck of living in France is that
we get to use "he" or "she" about objects) deserves a better parent than
someone who doesn't want him. Of course, in comparison with the 90....
seems like you *did get confused about the he's and she's in this case...;)
and "Doro's 200mm" ...
Uhh? What's that? Or, rather, who's Doro?
ROFL :)
Let's see, a nickname for your
wife who's taken an interrest in tele-photo? ;) If not, then enlighten
me...
chris most definitely is *not my husband and won't *ever be anybodys
husband...
On the other hand I do take an interest in telephoto - in 180s and 300s,
to be specific (talking of Zuikos, aren't we?).
So - the 200 had to move to another list member...
cheers
:D oro
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|