At 11:14 3/17/02, Mickey Trageser asked:
Oh John, you just keep raisning the bar.
It's a bad habit; bad for the bank account, that is.
Except for a few small OM "odds and ends" convenience items the 35mm small
format system currently has what it needs. It was gradually expanded in
size also. Been some time now since I've felt constrained by equipment in
being able to create what's visualized. Might eventually replace the 200/4
with a 180/2.8, but it's not even on the "Wanted" List (second tier below
the "Most Wanted").
A friend at work wants to bet on how soon a technical view camera shows up
via UPS.
Recently got "caught" surfing these pages:
http://www.wisner.com/16x20.htm
http://www.wisner.com/Page13.html
http://www.wisner.com/Page14.html
http://www.wisner.com/Page15.html
http://www.wisner.com/den.htm
http://www.wisner.com/vegas.htm
"SUV" becomes camera bag. <g>
Before I could say anything I was told not to even think about it. ;-)
OK. Not thinking about it. Is "dreaming" considered "thinking?"
Guess it depends on what the meaning of "is" is.
BTW, check out the lens price!
Is this a new item, or 'previously owned'? Either way, I know you'll make
good use of it!
Mickey
Previously owned (a.k.a. "used") in "EX" condition. The *new* price is
steep albeit not nearly as much as some MF lenses (e.g. Schneider-Kreuznach
or Carl Zeiss). Already have photographs in mind for it. Found myself
using OM's at times I wanted to use the 645. Only solution is expanding
the 645 system. OTOH, there's numerous occasions when the 645 is impractical.
-- John
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|