ML Archiv: Re: [OM] 180/2.8

Subject:	Re: [OM] 180/2.8
From:	Mike <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 18 Mar 2002 08:15:04 -0800

I believe there was discussion a while back concerning the 180/2.8. I
vaguely remember something about serial # above 200k being better but I
don't recall why. Perhaps someone can refresh my memory.

Mike
-- 
Latitude 48° 32' North, Longitude 123° 7' West

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] 180/2.8, (continued) Re: [OM] 180/2.8, Frank A Griffin Re: [OM] 180/2.8, The Mauler Re: [OM] 180/2.8, Chris Barker Re: [OM] 180/2.8, Dorothée Rapp [OM] New Fang? - was 180/2.8, Chris Barker Re: [OM] New Fang? - was 180/2.8, Larry Re: [OM] New Fang? - was 180/2.8, AG Schnozz Re: [OM] New Fang? - was 180/2.8, ll . clark Re: [OM] New Fang? - was 180/2.8, Chris Barker Re: [OM] 180/2.8, Peter Dixon Re: [OM] 180/2.8, Mike <= Re: [OM] 180/2.8, Roger D. Key Re: [OM] 180/2.8, Roger Wesson Re: [OM] 180/2.8, Walt Wayman Re: [OM] 180/2.8, Walt Wayman Re: [OM] 180/2.8, NSURIT Re: [OM] 180/2.8, M. Lloyd Re: [OM] 180/2.8, NSURIT

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] After the snowstorm, Bernd Moeller
Next by Date:	RE: [OM] the woes of electronics, William Clark
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] 180/2.8, Peter Dixon
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] 180/2.8, Roger D. Key
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]