Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Is this a Fang?

Subject: Re: [OM] Is this a Fang?
From: dreammoose <dreammoose@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 12:01:19 -0800
There are 4 different 35-70mm Zuikos that might come with a single digit OM camera.

35-70/3.6 - The first, and only full Zuiko 35-70mm. Also the biggest and heaviest cause it's the fastest at 70mm. Really clever, unique design where the lens gets longer as the focal length gets shorter. Thus the slip on lens hood that attaches behind the part that moves with zooming, actually varies the angle it covers to be effective at all focal lengths. The only lens I know of that does this. At the time it came out, it was important also because it vastly outperformed the Nikon 43-86mm zoom, proving short zooms could be competitive with 50mm standard lenses and giving Oly a 'rep' boost.

The 'S Zuiko's were all produced as consumer, rather than full quality Zuikos 35-70/4 - Cheaper, slower, 7 elements in 7 groups vs. the 10-8 of the f3.6, yet essentially the same size and weight. 35-70/3.5-4.5 - Not quite as good optically as the f3/6, but 2/3 the length, half the weight and focuses closer than the f3.6. A unique design where the f-stop stays the same throughout the zoom range when set to f4.5 or higher . 35-70/3.5-4.8 - Inferior optically to the rest and not a true Zuiko, as it was made by Cosina to go with the OM2000.

There are also one with self contained Auto-Focus and versions for the OM-707 & 101.

My personal opinion is that the only 2 worth considering are the 3.6 for overall quality and uniquely functional hood and the 3.5-4.5 for amazing size and weight. Others seem to prize the f4, which makes no sense on paper, but I've never had one, so can't speak from experience. I bought an f3.6 new in the late 70s and think it's an excellent lens. At first I worried it wouldn't be as good as a prime lens, but soon quit using the 50/1.8 SC I got with my first OM-1 and used the zoom as my primary lens. Looking at Gary's lens tests, I see why, the zoom is a much better lens!

Moose

Paul Kraig wrote:

Sorry, didn't clarify.  The seller and I never even discussed the lens once
the OM-4T was brought up - besides I just blew my budget on the camera.  I
have never cared much for zooms, but is it a decent lens?

-----Original Message-----
Behalf Of Timpe, Jim
You didn't give details on the 35-70, did you?



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz