Rick,
You call yourself a Zuikoholic with that attiude. You need, really need
a 24 or 28 :).
John( with absolutely no resistance, and no money)
Rick Adshead wrote:
>
> Frieder,
> You hit the nail right on the head. I was not sure if I really wanted a lens
> in
> between these 2 and I just asked to see if there were any very strong
> opinions about
> either the 24 or the 28. Apparently there is not and since the 21 is
> relatively new
> for me. I think that I will just stick with the 21 and 35 for now and forget
> about
> the other 2.
> (how's that for zuikoholicism resistance!)
>
> Thanks everyone for your opinions.
>
> Rick
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> May I ask do you really wan`t to carry that amount of lenses with you?
> The step 21mm -> 35mm is a factor of 1.67. Olympus recomended
> a factor of 1.6 for a good line up of primes.
> ...snip...
> Frieder Faig
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Greetings - send holiday greetings for Easter, Passover
> http://greetings.yahoo.com/
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|