BTW, my labs can do even larger if necessary. They tell me the Blad is
fine..4x5 is awkward. Ansel used Blad a lot towards the end of this working
life. If it's good enough for him...
Roger
pet05.jpg (10752 bytes) <http://www.robinsnestphotography.com/> Roger
Skully
Robin’s Nest Photography
www.robinsnestphotography.com <http://www.robinsnestphotography.com/>
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jim Brokaw
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 6:29 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] E10 and Smartmedia cards
on 4/1/02 4:55 PM, Robin's Nest Photography at robinsnes@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I was photographing a job this weekend
snipped a bit...
> P.S. I will continue, of course, to use film on events and all important
> jobs. I now think anyone who depends solely on digital is foolish and
using
> a medium that is inherently a little prone to too many problems...let's
not
> get into the down side of film.
Roger, you're a working pro; with film cameras you would have a backup body
(or two...) With digital, I guess you need two E-10's or E-20's, and
multiple media cards, and maybe a laptop with reader to verify contents...
just in case something 'glitches' on you. I concur that digital isn't quite
'there' yet when the chips are down.
As for medium format, if you're doing 30"x40" prints, maybe you need a 4x5
camera!
--
Jim Brokaw
OM-1's, -2's, -4's, (no -3's yet) and no OM-oney...
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|