ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms

Subject:	Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?
From:	"Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 5 Apr 2002 21:04:39 -0500

Isn't this the lens that is speculated to by the same as the Zuiko (i.e.
Olympus outsourced the 35-105).

Tom

> Here's an example of an alternative.  No connection etc
>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1344105314
>



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, Steve Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, Wayne Culberson Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, dreammoose Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, Mike Cormier Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, Dave Dougherty RE: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, Timpe, Jim Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, Wayne Culberson Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, Dave Dougherty RE: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, Timpe, Jim Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, Tom Scales <= Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, dreammoose Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, John A. Lind [OM] Ultra Rare OM-1/2 MD cover, M. Lloyd Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, Roger D. Key Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, dreammoose Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, Brian Swale Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, ClassicVW Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, ClassicVW Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, C.H.Ling

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] FS: 40/2, Vivitar S1, Charles Sdunek
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Re: Old Zuikos sharper than new Canon Zooms?, C.H.Ling
Previous by Thread:	RE: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, Timpe, Jim
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?, dreammoose
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Wide Range Zooms - any good ?