| Subject: | Re: [OM] Don?t sneeze at 3.5 Macro, 35/2 MC |
|---|---|
| From: | Larry <Halpert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 07 Apr 2002 18:55:58 -0400 |
Maybe not....The weight might have been difficult to deal with. Larry Walt Wayman wrote: > Like, I wish it was a 180/2! Sorry. > > Walt Wayman > > > > > > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] and just to show the sharpness of the 90/2, Larry |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Poster size on the Epson 1270, Tom Scales |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: [OM] Don't sneeze at 3.5 Macro, 35/2 MC, Tom Scales |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Don?t sneeze at 3.5 Macro, 35/2 MC, Jim Brokaw |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |