Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] [OT] Needed: KODAK PROFESSIONAL PRO IMAGE 100 Film

Subject: RE: [OM] [OT] Needed: KODAK PROFESSIONAL PRO IMAGE 100 Film
From: "Michael Virsinger" <mikev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 23:54:29 -0400
OK then - Who would be willing to send me some if they come across it? I
would gladly cover all expenses for 10-20 rolls of it. Keep in mind to
try out a roll if you do find it to see what I mean...

Thanks,

Mike V. <><

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of C.H.Ling
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 4:27 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] [OT] Needed: KODAK PROFESSIONAL PRO IMAGE 100 Film


Tris Schuler wrote:
> 
> There may well be precedent for this, and not too long ago there was a

> thread on Photonet which claimed (second hand) that "someone" had 
> "said" he had information that the Fujipress emulsions (or at least 
> the 800 stuff) were the same as regular Superia emulsions only taken 
> from the "middle" of the runs.

No surprise, I also heard the same here, their description and purpose
are nothing special. Just like the RA (Sensia II) and RAP (Astia) I
believe they are the same. But when one claim portrait film and the
other claim general purpose, a bit harder to believe. 

C.H.Ling

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz