Maybe the one in the photo is not what they are getting.
Bryan Pilati
OM-2N
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Goss" <steveg3@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 9:32 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] 135 at eB*y
> Well amn3000 got it for $51.00 I hope they're happy getting the f3.5,
after
> looking at a photo of the F2.8. Just for so, I held up my two 135's (one
of
> each) next to the photo in the auction, and the photo is definitely a 2.8.
> 1. The diameter of the hood is almost the same as the diameter of the
aperture
> and focusing rings on the 2.8, and about the diameter of the gap between
the
> aperture and focusing rings on the 3.5. The photo has the wide diameter
hood.
> 2. The apertures on the 3.5 go 3.5, 5.6, 8, 11, 16, 22. On the 2.8, they
go
> 2.8, 4, 5.6, 8, 11, 16, 22. The photo shows an F4.
>
> Good catch, Morgan
>
> Thanks, Steve Goss, Dallas Tx usa
>
> "msparks@xxxxxxxxxxxx" wrote:
> >
> > Well, I just got an answer about whether this lens is the F3.5 or the
f2.8 The seller says it's the 3.5 . . Problem is, his photo sure looks
like the 2.8
> >
> > http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1346331199
> >
> > 41 minutes left . . . start cancelling your snipes!
> >
> > Morgan
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > mail2web - Check your email from the web at
> > http://mail2web.com/ .
> >
> > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|