Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 135 at eB*y

Subject: Re: [OM] 135 at eB*y
From: Chris Barker <imagopus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 19:10:11 +0100
Cc: Jim Brokaw <jbrokaw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
A simple way of taking producing an image is to put the object on a
flatbed scanner with a sheet of white paper above.  It has worked for
all my images, even if it is a little limited in aspect or angle.

I too would find it difficult to bid on an object whose image I had
not seen.  I would not bid if I thought that the seller was using a
generic image to misrepresent the condition or the description...

Chris

At 23:03 -0700 22/4/02, Jim Brokaw wrote:
Mark - If you're selling in e*ay you really should post pictures of the
actual item you are selling... it *always* makes me wonder if the seller
admits that the picture is not the actual item for sale, and I've passed on
auctions due to that. Especially with photographic items, I wonder why can't
this guy post a picture, what's he hiding...? Even if you don't have a
digicam, shoot a few pics and scan them on a $30 flatbed scanner... I think
you seriously lower the amount you can hope to get for the item by putting
up a 'stock' picture or no picture, even if there is full description in
text.
--

Jim Brokaw
OM-1's, -2's, -4's, (no -3's yet) and no OM-oney...

--
<|_:-)_|>

C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
?
+44 (0)7092 251126
mailto:imagopus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:zuiko@xxxxxxx
http://www.threeshoes.co.uk
... a nascent photo library.

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz