Mark,
Just keep it up, and I might just have to go out and buy me a 50/f2
macro too. I have the 3.5 now, and love it, but if you say just one more
time how much you love yours, I am in trouble. Just quit being such a
damn good enabler! ;-)
John
"M. Lloyd" wrote:
>
> It all breaks down to how much you want a certain
> lens. Is a 50/1.2 a great lens, you bet! Is it worth a
> $250 premium over a 50/1.8 or 50/1.4 which are also
> good sharp lenses depends on your opinion alone. It's
> not a black and white choice great lens vs crappy or
> mediocre one since all the 50mm's are pretty good
> lenses barring the earliest 50/1.4's (and some of
> those are pretty good too).
>
> I bought a 50/2 macro and sold a 50/3.5 to get it. Is
> the 50/2 a great lens absolutley! Is it better and
> easier to use than the 3.5; definitely, IMO. Is it
> worth the 200-250 dollar premium? I think so but
> that's just me.
>
> Mark Lloyd
>
> --- Wayne Harridge <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|