Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Fuji vs Kodak

Subject: Re: [OM] Fuji vs Kodak
From: "Pete Prunskunas" <pyotr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 13:41:16 -0600
> For my sister's wedding, the alleged "pro photographer" used Kodak Gold
> 100's.  I used Portra 160, and mine BLEW her's out of the water as far as
> trueness to skintones etc..  The Kodak Gold was very warm and being asian,
> we all turned brown...  The NPC 160 from Fuji was just as good, I couldn't
> tell it apart from the Kodak, AND the Konica 160 was excellent as well.
So
> if you are going to shoot "people", then go with the portra...  The Velvia
> makes people turn red and green, the skintone is horrid... but with
Velvia,
> man, those waterfall shots...

Which flash did you use with the Portra 160: T32 or F280?
Was it Portra 160NC or 160VC?


Pete




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz