So are you suggesting we use Fuji for Asians and Kodak for white folks? :)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pete Prunskunas" <pyotr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 3:41 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] Fuji vs Kodak
> > For my sister's wedding, the alleged "pro photographer" used Kodak Gold
> > 100's. I used Portra 160, and mine BLEW her's out of the water as far
as
> > trueness to skintones etc.. The Kodak Gold was very warm and being
asian,
> > we all turned brown... The NPC 160 from Fuji was just as good, I
couldn't
> > tell it apart from the Kodak, AND the Konica 160 was excellent as well.
> So
> > if you are going to shoot "people", then go with the portra... The
Velvia
> > makes people turn red and green, the skintone is horrid... but with
> Velvia,
> > man, those waterfall shots...
>
> Which flash did you use with the Portra 160: T32 or F280?
> Was it Portra 160NC or 160VC?
>
>
> Pete
>
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|