Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] [OT]Irony - was Caution etc...

Subject: Re: [OM] [OT]Irony - was Caution etc...
From: "Craig Henrikson" <chenriks@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 08:25:49 -0400
Andy -- If you believe that, I've got a great bridge in NY City that you can
take over - cheap!

Craig


----- Original Message -----
From: "Andy Gilbert" <gilbs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus List" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 6:17 PM
Subject: [OM] [OT]Irony - was Caution etc...


> Charles Sdunek wrote:
> >
> > Hey, its ok, I was just kidding.  But seriously, how can you guys take
> > us seriously when we have people sueing mcdonalds because they spilt
> > thier coffee in their laps and it happened to be hot?  heheh  Not to
> > mention the burgler who fell through the skylight window of the house he
> > was robbing and won a lawsuit against the homeowners....  Lot's of
> > rediculous people and things here.
>
> Here's one was sent to me, can this really be true???  I can almost
believe
> the above could happen over here in the UK now, but read on.............
>
> Subject: Fw: There is Justice in the World
>
>  Here's a heartwarming lawyer story:
>
>       A Charlotte, NC lawyer purchased a box of very
> rare and expensive
> cigars, then insured them against fire (among other
>  things) Within a
> month, having smoked his entire stockpile of these
> great cigars, and not
>  yet having made even his first premium payment on
> the policy, the lawyer
>  filed a claim against the insurance company. In his
> claim, the lawyer
>  stated the cigars were lost "in a series of small
>  fires."
>       The insurance company refused to pay, citing
> the obvious reason:
>  the man had consumed the cigars in the normal
>  fashion. The lawyer sued....and won!
>      In delivering the ruling, the judge agreed with
> the insurance
> company that the claim was frivolous, however, the
> judge stated that the
>  lawyer held a policy from the company in which ithad warranted that the
>  cigars were insurable, and had guaranteed that it
> would indeed insure
> them against fire, without defining what is
>  considered "unacceptable
>  fire"- and was obligated to pay the claim.
>       Rather than endure a lengthy and costly appeal
>  process, the
>  insurance company accepted the ruling and paid
>  $15,000.00 to the lawyer
>  for his incendiary bamboozle.
>
>  NOW FOR THE GOOD PART.............
>
> After the lawyer cashed the check, the insurance
> company had him
>  arrested on 24 counts of ARSON!!!!! with HIS OWN
>  INSURANCE CLAIM AND
> TESTIMONY FROM THE PREVIOUS CASE BEING USED AGAINST
> HIM, THE LAWYER WAS
>  CONVICTED OF INTENTIONALLY BURNING HIS INSURED
>  PROPERTY AND SENTENCED
> HIM TO 24 MONTHS IN JAIL AND A $24,000.00 FINE.
>
>  This is a true story and was the 1st place winner in
> the recent Criminal Lawyers Award Contest
>
> Perhaps I could sue you guys in the USA for passing on this dreadful
disease
> (Zuikoholism) I was a simple 1 body & 3 primes sort of chap before I came
> across you people :)
>
>
> Andy Gilbert
> Exeter
> Devon
> England
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz