Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] lens mounts

Subject: Re: [OM] lens mounts
From: "Bryan Pilati" <bryan223@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 19:12:38 -0400
Brass is cheaper to machine, among other traits.

Bryan Pilati
OM-2N; IS-3
Va-USA
Disclaimer:  I'm always joking
unless I should be serious.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dan Lau" <dlau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 7:05 PM
Subject: RE: [OM] lens mounts


> On Wed, 29 May 2002 15:25, Mike <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Brass is far more malleable that stainless,.....snipped
> >>
> >Brass is also very heavy. Not a good trait if smaller and lighter is
> >better.
> 
> Are you saying brass is heavier than stainless steel?  Surely
> in the quantity of material used for the lens mount, there is
> not much difference in weight between the two metals.  I am
> not sure how much smaller (and lighter, if at all) the lens
> mount can be made from stainless steel compared to brass.
> 
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> 

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz