Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Zuiko 200mm f/4

Subject: Re: [OM] Zuiko 200mm f/4
From: "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 15:31:50 -0400
I haven't seen a single post that said the f/5 was 'better', just different.
No question the f/4 is actually, in quality, the better lens.  I prefer the
f/5 because it is smaller, but that is personal preference.  I think if you
took a vote, the f/4 would win here.

Tom

> I would like to know what the sudden interest in "bashing" the f/4 lens
is.
> For a long time the opinions were that it was a fine lens and worth
owning,
> and now I see lots of discussion about the f/5 lens being better, blah,
> blah, blah....  I thought all Zuikos were good lenses.  It took me a while
> to choose to purchase the f/4 and I based my purchase in part on the
> opinions of this list and other OM sources.
>
> Bryan Pilati



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz