Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Decent sites for OM equipment?

Subject: Re: [OM] Decent sites for OM equipment?
From: Tal Lancaster <talrmr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 07:41:17 -0700
On Tue, 02 Jul 2002 17:06:09 +0800
"C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> If you are searching for 35-70/3.6 and 65-200, please take extreme
> care in the inspection of the lens element inside. The 35-70/3.6 has a
> common problem of element separation on a rear lens group. The 65-200
> has a common problem of an inside element (also rear group) getting
> oil vapor on the surface, when long enough without attention, the
> element will permanent damage. I found two 35-70/3.6 and two 65-200
> has these problem and hard the same problem from my friends too.
> 
[Snip..Snip]

Thanks.  Sound like I should stear clear of those two.  What are good
alternatives are there that are about as good optically, but are less
prone to problems?

-- 
Tal Lancaster
talrmr@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.renderman.org/RMR

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz