Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?

Subject: Re: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?
From: "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 19:08:37 -0400
I wouldn't rush into a 21/2.  The 21/3.5 is a wonderful lens and while I do
own the 21/2, I am not sure it is worth the extra money. Put that into
another lens.

As for the 28/2 vs. 35/2, I guess I can't really tell them apart in
sharpness. I just rarely use the 35 focal length.  Don't even own one.

Tom

> Hmm, that's what I did with the 21/3.5.  I've got my eye out for a 21/2,
> but not enough $ yet.
>
> I've heard rumor that the 28 is sharper than the 35 - any comments?
>
> <snip>
>
> Ah, in that case, buy a 28/2.8 for almost nothing and see if you like
> the focal length.  If so, sell it and buy a 28/2.  Personally I use the
> 28 ten times more than the 35, but I have the 40.  I also use the 21
> more than the rest combined.
>



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz