Whoa! Now hold on there! Zuiko Zen is only 1 body 2 lenses (maybe 3 if
you can make a good argument). If I wanted weight, I would carry around
the 24 shift! ;)
I also have the 18/3.5, but don't use it much on the street. The 21/3.5
seems a lot nicer to me w/o the extra bit of stretch on the long edges.
I have often considered pitching the 18/3.5 and 21/3.5 in favor of the
21/2, but it has often gotten me out of a tight situation, and will
prove itself worthy just like the 16/3.5 will do occasionally. When I
do use the 18/3.5, I enjoy the extra room on the short side of the
frame, and will crop a bit top and bottom to remove the offending extra
stretch.
I also have to say, that if I have more architecture to do that day, I
will carry the 35 shift and 135/2.8. extremely useful lenses that cover
a very good range.
<snip>
I also have the 18/3.5, 24/2, 35/2 sequence (plus 50/1.2, 85/2,
135/2.8). Very nicely spaced and I haven't felt the need for greater
versatility (gap from 85->135 is plugged with 35-105 zoom).
-- John
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|