Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 24/2 (was: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?)

Subject: Re: 24/2 (was: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?)
From: plp@xxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 14:08:57 GMT
Cc:
>Ok, here is some samples from my Europe trip in 92'.
>http://www.accura.com.hk/OM/Z24.htm
>The top left one shown the waveform distortion, that is the
>worse case you will found and it can be avoided if more care-
>fully when taking the shot.

That is some nasty waveform distortion.  I think I will look
for a 24/2.8 instead.  Gary's tests are vindicated once again.


Pete





________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz