Actually, I can't. I sold my 100/2.8 (and 100/2) and kept my 85/2. That,
in a nutshell, says it all. The lens that stays mounted on the body is the
85/2. There is something indescribable about it. It is just so smooth, and
bright, and small, and light.
Just an amazing lens.
The 100/2.8 is good, but the 85/2 is great.
Tom
> Schnozz,
>
> I dunno, but I'm glad you asked the question, because I've wondered the
> same thing. My observation is that the 100 f/2.8 can be purchased for
> less $$ than the 85, for comparable quality.
>
> Perhaps someone like Tom Scales could tell us why we NEED both lenses...
>
> Bill Stanke
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|