Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] zuiko 135mm 2.8 or 3.5?

Subject: RE: [OM] zuiko 135mm 2.8 or 3.5?
From: "Robert Gries" <rgg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 07:52:15 -0500
David:

I would say that you will be much more pleased with the 85/2 than the
135/2.8.  in fact, if you are looking to horse trade for least amount of
cash outlay, then I would also sell your 50mm (if you have one) because
it will be replaced  by the 85/2.  I'm sure many know of my discomfort
with the 50mm (which may be unique to me), but I'd say get the 85/2, and
worry about the rest later.  I have also had good results with the 2x-A
and 85/2 combo, if you are still looking for that extra length...

Bob

<snip>

would the 100 or the 85 be lots better (I did see the discussion on the
85/2!), though these are LOTS more expensive (AUD400 for the 100/3.5) 

TIA,

davidt
Adelaide, South Australia


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz