Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 24/2 (was: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?)

Subject: Re: 24/2 (was: [OM] 28/2 or 35/2?)
From: Jim Brokaw <jbrokaw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 20:39:50 -0700
After I posted that message I realized that I wasn't clear about -which- 21
was the lens using 49mm filters... of course it is the 21/3.5. I have had
one of those for several years, and really love its 'wide' feeling,
especially for interior shots. I recently got the 21/2.0, and that lens has
that same 'wide' feeling, but also something more... not sure how to put a
name to it, but the view seems to look better. I think the 2.0 aperture
helps focusing with a lens as wide as the 21's, too. But a kit using the
21/3.5 would still be a great compact all-49mm-filter kit!
-- 

Jim Brokaw
OM-1's, -2's, -4's, (no -3's yet) and no OM-oney...


on 7/30/02 9:58 PM, Jim Couch at jamesbcouch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Actually the 21 f/2 uses a 55 mm filter. If you could live with the 21 f/3.5
> it
> uses a 49 mm filter, one of the major reasons I chose to go that direction.
> 
> Jim Couch
> 
> Jim Brokaw wrote:
> 
>> Not only are they all great lenses, but all use 49mm filters... including
>> the 50/1.2! I still like the 21/2.0 as a lens with real eye appeal, its just
>> a sweet pleasure to look through it...
>> --
>> 
>> Jim Brokaw
>> OM-1's, -2's, -4's, (no -3's yet) and no OM-oney...


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz