Winsor, you're a tempter ;-)
But is it not just a little on the large and unwieldy side?
Chris
At 12:17 -0700 31/7/02, Winsor Crosby wrote:
If you use a 50 Bryan. I am using 50 les and less.
-snip
Chris
Something to consider is that I hardly ever use a 35, 50 or 85 since
getting the 35-80/2.8. It is an amazingly fine lens and is only
taken off for macro, 24 or longer telephoto which is surprisingly
seldom. I think the quality is matched only by the 85/2 perhaps.
Expensive, but not considering the smaller kit and cost of lenses it
replaces as well as the fact that the right focal length is on the
camera 90 0f the time.
--
Winsor Crosby
Long Beach, California
?
--
<|_:-)_|>
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
?
+44 (0)7092 251126
mailto:imagopus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.threeshoes.co.uk
... a nascent photo library.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|