Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 35-80, was 85/2 subject matter

Subject: Re: [OM] 35-80, was 85/2 subject matter
From: "Clemente Colayco" <litefoot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2002 07:22:12 +0800
I am ready to be one...having owned one then sold it, I am ready to make
amends...

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Barker" <imagopus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 11:11 PM
Subject: RE: [OM] 35-80, was 85/2 subject matter


Cruel Skip, cruel!  Bad master, so perhaps the little 28-48 will run
away to a good master :>).

Chris

At 08:41 -0400 2/8/02, om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>The voices speak to me too.  Most recently from the 50/2 and 16/3.5, which
>I ignored and sold them into slavery.
>
>The evil thoughts are now turning to a 35/2, 28/2.8, and 28-48/4, and
>perhaps an OM-4t Champagne.  Perhaps I'll wait and see how loud they squeal
>first?  Eh?
>
>Skip
>

--
<|_:-)_|>

C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
.
+44 (0)7092 251126
mailto:imagopus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.threeshoes.co.uk
... a nascent photo library.

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz