Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 35-80, was 85/2 subject matter

Subject: Re: [OM] 35-80, was 85/2 subject matter
From: "Martin G Flink" <mgflink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 21:33:29 -0700
Hi Chris...I picked up my 35-105 from C.H. Ling about that time and found it
to be a very versatile range...A light kit of an OM1n including 85/2, 35/2,
35-105 and a T20 gives me good coverage for most general needs...Marty


-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Barker <imagopus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, August 01, 2002 10:39 PM
Subject: RE: [OM] 35-80, was 85/2 subject matter


Just so Lee.  I sold a 35-105 late last year and I have regretted
since almost the day I did.  I don't think I could afford the
therapy... ;-)

Chris

At 00:07 -0500 2/8/02, Lee Penzias wrote:
>I do, but it is just one. The one that reminds of some of the things
>I have sold or otherwise parted with in the past that I have later
>much regretted. There are some things that I would think long and
>hard about now before I parted with them under anything but dire
>circumstances. And what I see as "dire" has changed some too ;)
>
>Cheers
>Lee

--
<|_:-)_|>

C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
?
+44 (0)7092 251126
mailto:imagopus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.threeshoes.co.uk
... a nascent photo library.

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz