Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] PX625 Hg replacement ?

Subject: Re: [OM] PX625 Hg replacement ?
From: "John A. Lind" <jlind@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2002 11:39:19 -0500
At 08:27 8/5/02, Joel Wilcox wrote:

If you buy a MR-9 new, it will say on the package to use an SR43 battery. If you buy one used, I am guessing that if it is brushed metal finish, it takes an SR43. If it is polished metal, it takes a SR44.

Perhaps someone else who has both will confirm or deny this?

Joel W.

Both of mine use SR44W/357 cells and they have a decidedly "non-glossy" metal finish. I don't think the finish will serve as a descriminator. There is a distinct size difference in the diameters of #357 and #386 cells, 1.2 millimeters (they are the same height). If the adapter can be compared to each type of cell, even if the cell is in a bubble pack, it should become obvious which one it is made for.

Again, I recommend the #386 watch cell for the ones currently being sold and #357 watch cell for the older ones. Unlike other silver cells with the same form factors, they both hold voltage constant until the bitter end and are designed to tolerate high pulse drain on demand. For more details about what I found in Energizer's data sheets about different cells, see my recent posting dated 3 August in the digest archives under the subject "New OM-1 user."

-- John


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz