Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] oops

Subject: RE: [OM] oops
From: "IanG" <I@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 21:03:44 -0700
That was me, thanks Marten

I didn't get to bid on the 300 4.5 in question but, judging by yout print,
it'll certainly perform more than adequately for my purposes.

Many thnaks
Ian

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Marten Beels
Sent: 05 August 2002 12:24
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] oops


Several days ago I made reference to a photo, but now
I realize that it was set to Private, not Public, so
it was not visible.

Someone was talking about using a Zuiko 300mm f/4.5
with the Vivitar 2x macro focusing teleconverter and I
was sharing my results.  The print is a touch soft,
but you can see all the individual hairs on this
chipmunk in the original.  I realize that you
certainly can't judge image sharpness by looking at a
scan from a print, though.  The 8x10 is acceptable to
me, for my purposes.

It is in the nature folder at
http://photos.yahoo.com/mbeels

Marten

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
http://health.yahoo.com

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >





< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [OM] oops, Marten Beels
    • RE: [OM] oops, IanG <=
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz