Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Seems pricey...

Subject: Re: [OM] Seems pricey...
From: Larry <halpert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2002 03:28:19 -0400
Of course, list price was able to be pretty far from what you actually paid. Got
my OM-2N at the beginning of '81 for $232 including 50mm f1.8 from whatever
store was cheapest in Manhattan (advertising in the back of Magazines). Probably
was Wall St. Camera, or Executive Photo.

Larry

Bill Pearce wrote:

> "List price on an OM-1n body only was $350 chrome $380 black. OM-2n was $430
> chrome, and $460 black. The OM-4 listed at $685 for body only. A 50 f/1.8
> would add $100 to the list price."
>
> Wow! I know I'm getting into old fart territory here, but I remember the
> seventies as being cheaper than that, even with rampant inflation. I would
> think that after correcting for 25 years of inflation, those list prices
> wouldn't be too far off from the last quoted lists of the OM3/4T's. Sobering
> thoughts!
>
> Bill Pearce
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz