Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Ugh. Stupidity strikes again.

Subject: Re: [OM] Ugh. Stupidity strikes again.
From: "Martin G Flink" <mgflink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 14:29:45 -0700
I assume that on a OM1n it makes no difference with a flash mounted on the
hot shoe if its set at X or FP, but on an OM1 it has to be set at X if the
flash is mounted on the shoe...Is this correct?   Marty


-----Original Message-----
From: Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, August 12, 2002 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] Ugh. Stupidity strikes again.


>On Mon, 12 Aug 2002 12:43, "Robert Gries" <rgg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>Well, after it happened on my Y*shicaMat, I taped down the lever so that
>>it would never happen again, but sadly the FP/X lever on the OM-1n was
>>set incorrectly, and wasted 2-1/2 rolls of good macro tests.
>
>I thought the FP/X switch only affects the hot-shoe on the OM-1
>and not the OM-1n, whose hot-shoe is always "X".  I had a whole
>vacation's flash pictures ruined because the switch on my OM-1
>got tripped to FP accidentally and I didn't notice it.  After
>that, I got myself an OM-1n and didn't worry about it since.
>
>My understanding is that the FP/X switch on the OM-1n only affects
>the socket and not the hot-shoe.

That is why John Hermanson as part of a a CLA will disable the switch
for you so that it is always X.
--
Winsor Crosby
Long Beach, California

?

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz