Dave,
I actually never go any place with out a 21 or 18. I shoot a lot of stuff
below 35mm. I have the .8 converter for my E-10 but I still tend to use the
OM4Ti and the wide angles quite a bit.
I would like to see the camera go at least 28mm equivalent with out the
converter. That would bring it to a 22mm with the converter. 24mm would be
better, but that is not going to happen until they go to a larger ccd like
in the planned SLR.
Mark
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Dougherty" <davdou@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "OLYMPUS" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:42 AM
Subject: [OM] Digital SLR
> At the expense of being "politically incorrect", I find that not having to
> change lenses is one of the charms of my E-20. For some on the list, the
> present zoom lens range isn't sufficient. However, if most would go back
> and look at the photos they take and review the focal lengths used, they
> would find that 35-140mm covers the range; especially with the macro
> capabilties of this camera.
>
> An E-30 with faster write speeds and a 38-200mm (35mm equivalent) zoom and
a
> greater asa range would be a pretty compelling outfit.
>
> Dave Dougherty
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|