I sold a 65-200 not long ago; perfect condition, no fungus or oil. So they
do exist!
Roger Key, Copenhagen
>This is getting silly. I found a *perfect* specimen of this lens. From the
>look of the mount, it had almost never been used. There on the third
element
>in from the rear was the (now) expected coating of something (speckled
this
>time). Given the low usage of the lens, it shouldn't be oil thrown from
the
>diaphragm mechanism, or every single one would have it. If it's fungus,
why
>always the same element. Why always this design? When will I find one
worth
>buying?
>Julian
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|