Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] MJ's reply for the Zuiko 50/1.8

Subject: RE: [OM] MJ's reply for the Zuiko 50/1.8
From: William Clark <wclark@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 11:57:11 -0400
de-commissioned maybe?

-bill

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Stanke [mailto:bstanke@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: September 23, 2002 11:48 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] MJ's reply for the Zuiko 50/1.8


Tim,

Sorry, I'm lost.  What does "de-accessioned" mean?

Bill Stanke

suchismit@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> I wrote to Mike Johnston just after I read the
> 50mm lens article on luminous-landscape.com. He spoke
> very highly of the 50/2 but not so well about the 50/1.8
> Here's my mail to him and his reply.
> -Tim

<snip>
 
> I can¹t tell you which version I used for that
> picture...I¹ve had several
> over the years and they¹re all de-accessioned now.
> 
> It¹s not a bad lens by any means, though.
> 
> --Mike
> 
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz