Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #3618

Subject: [OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #3618
From: "Thomas A Simmons" <tasimmons@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 11:40:52 -0700
Grrrrrrrrrrr YES! Sure, it helps me look better (pun intended).
At a cost roughly equal to a LNIB 180 F2 each, and this is my 5th.

B*^&%#$s!!!!!

Tom

Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 08:14:20 -0700
From: "Timpe, Jim" <Jim.Timpe@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [OM] Digital photography article

Tom...  my wife just had a new eye made this past summer.  She's had a
prosthesis since she was 10 months old.  What has perpetually infuriated me
is the insurance companies' insistence each time a new eye is necessitated
to deem it a 'cosmetic' prosthesis, and therefore not medically required
(i.e. covered).  Curious if you've had similar experiences...

- -----Original Message-----
From: Thomas A Simmons

  I wear an interocular prosthetic, otherwise known as a glass eye.




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz