Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Junk or treasure/made or modified

Subject: Re: [OM] Junk or treasure/made or modified
From: "Wayne Culberson" <waynecul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 12:27:31 -0300
> I have made some real nice pictures with a disposable kodak panorama
camera,
> refilled with ilford 400 asa B+W film. I was still an architecture student
> at that time, and made a paper about childrens playgrounds in Amsterdam.
> After hearing the price of a 'real' panoramic camera I decided to go for
> this flimsy plastic thing. I made myself a new re-usable aluminium chassis
> in which the disposable fitted. The lens produced a lot of flare, but the
> pictures were very 'warm' and 'alive', getting them printed properly was
> very difficult however, nobody wanted to do it, so I ended up at a
> potography class! I scanned them all last year and they look even better,
> digitally remastered. This camera was one of my favorites and I have taken
> hundreds of photos with it. This was before my OM-itis however!
>
> iwert.

I think it would be interesting to have a thread on photography equipment
that people have made or modified, either because it wasn't available, or
was too expensive, or needed to be improved on. I know the recent article in
Lenswork said the main issue to them was the end product, that is the
picture (art), but for me I must confess I like the equipment and tinkering
with it as well as using it.
Wayne


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz