RE: [OM] Re: 35mm film lost the battle against digital ? NO WAYOK, this is
stage 2 of the HTML test. For those in digest PLEASE accept my apologies if
this comes through HTML. At least it will prove what I suspect is happening
and I'll then do everything I can to prevent it.
Regards,
Jon
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jon Mitchell
Sent: 08 October 2002 19:46
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [OM] Re: 35mm film lost the battle against digital ? NO WAY
To be fair to the Digital revolution in this case, I am a big fan of DVD.
Don't get me wrong, I know it's limitations. I watch some films, and one
concert I have on DVD in particular, and I cringe at the digital artefacts /
mpeg artefacts that I see. BUT the alternative (VHS) is just so poor that
DVD is a major step in the right direction.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of William Clark
Sent: 08 October 2002 18:59
To: 'olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: RE: [OM] Re: 35mm film lost the battle against digital ? NO WAY
He sounds like an industry insider to me ;o)
In any case, financial and entertainment experts on CNN have stated for
the past 5 years that volume sales of DVD would beat VHS. They haven't.
Maybe this year.
-----Original Message-----
From: Walt Wayman [mailto:hiwayman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: October 8, 2002 1:43 PM
To: INTERNET:olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [OM] Re: 35mm film lost the battle against digital ? NO WAY
|