Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Build quality differences between OM10/OM20/OM30/OM40

Subject: Re: [OM] Build quality differences between OM10/OM20/OM30/OM40
From: "John Hermanson" <omtech@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 07:54:27 -0400
OM-10s have the OM-G magnet setup over serial number 2,000,000.
_________________________________
John Hermanson  www.zuiko.com
Camtech, Olympus Sales & Service since 1977
21 South Lane, Huntington NY 11743-4714
631-424-2121 For Free Olympus manuals,
please call 1-800-221-3000 
_________________________________
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "dreammoose" <dreammoose@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 2:42 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] Build quality differences between OM10/OM20/OM30/OM40


> The 30 is too weird and takes extra batteries. Extra circuitry and 
> function that isn't to be used is just more stuff to go wrong.
> 
> The 10 with SN >1,000,000 has the same magnet setup as the 20 and 40, 
> much less prone to sticky magnet syndrome than the earlier 10s, but not 
> entirely immune. The placement of the magnets makes cleaning it much 
> easier too. There are also other reliability/performance enhancements on 
> the >1,000,000 OM-10s.
> 
> The 20/G is still a nicer camera, as it doesn't need an add on part to 
> do manual. It's often cheaper than a 10 plus manual adapter anyway. The 
> OMPC is my favorite. they brought over TTL flash, aperture and mirror 
> pre-fire from the OM-4, program mode from the 2sp, and added ESP 
> metering, which is really good for backlit and frontlit situations.
> 
> None of these cameras is likely to be as reliable as a single digit OM.
> 
> Moose
> 
> Dan Lau wrote:
> 
> >I know what the feature differences are between these
> >"consumer" grade models, but if I want to get a camera for
> >someone who is just starting out on learning photography (i.e.,
> >strictly manual mode metering, with some auto exposure once in
> >a while), is there any real differences between these models?
> >
> >I will probably avoid the OM10 because of the oily magnet
> >problem and the need for a separate manual module.  I gave my
> >OM40 (OM/PC) to my son to use and I've been very pleased with
> >that body -- except for a minor light leak problem.  And now I
> >am looking to acquire another inexpensive "consumer" grade body
> >to help someone else learn photography.  If I don't care for
> >the "focus assist" of the OM30 (OM/F), is there any difference
> >between it and the OM20 (OM/G) or OM40? In other words, should
> >my buying decision between the OM20/OM30/OM40 be purely based
> >on the price (all things being equal)?
> >
> >I know these consumer models also share many components, so
> >between the OM20 (OM/G), the OM30 (OM/F) and OM40 (OM/PC), is
> >one more robust than another?  I've noticed there are more OM20
> >and OM40 for sale than OM30, so maybe I can get lucky with a
> >bargain if I aim for an OM30.  Thanks.
> > -Dan
> >
> >< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> >< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> >< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> 
> 


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz