Hi John,
Well, I didn't venture into the realm of IR for this event, but am
considering it in the future. ;-)
Thanks for your remarks regarding the film use. I am pleased with the 800
results. I should see the 1600 soon. Thanks too, for your comments on my
posted film shots. You pointed out #36 and upon looking at it again, I came
to like it quite a bit. But it wasn't the 'end' of the roll, and neither was
#1 the beginning! I got 38 out of that roll from 00 to E. I looked again at
E and think I like it even more than 36 for composition and exposure. It's
lanscape from a slightly different angle. The bokeh is nice like 36, and
Lucas's expression is a little different. I have to clean up the scan, but
hope to insert it into the webspace later.
Sometime ago, you offered some excellent advice regarding a wedding I was
shooting. I still haven't scanned those images. Since I didn't get it done
before giving the prints to the bride, I have only the negs and poor memory
to select those that I want to scan. I still plan on doing that, when time
allows. The bride is sitting on the print order, which isn't a problem,
since my gift was the photo job and the 4x6 prints. But if she gets the
order to me, I'll also get the prints to ensure that I get the right stuff
printed (and find those that I wish to scan in the process...).
Thanks again for your help, John.
Mickey
----- Original Message -----
From: "John A. Lind" <jlind@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 1:44 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] newborn shots?
> Geez, from IR to daylight color film under manmade available light!!!
> IR for this might be verrrry interesting! <g>
>
> More seriously, you shouldn't have any trouble with Fuji 1600 Press. Fuji
> shows three 1600 speed daylight color negative films: Super HG 1600,
> Superia 1600 and Press 1600. IIRC, Press 1600 is the same as consumer
> Superia 1600 with Fuji's "4-layer" emulsion. Super HG 1600 *is* different
> from Superia 1600 and it does not have the "4-layer" emulsion. I've shot
> Press 1600 Press under available light in an art gallery with a mix of low
> wattage incandescent, halogen spots and indirect daylight coming through
> windows. Worked much better than expected; very natural looking. Note
> that it was developed and the proofs printed by a pro lab that does color
> balancing extremely well.
>
> Use the film that works best with the lighting level you have.
>
> Be certain the first act of your newborn grandchild is signing an
> unconditional model release that covers delivery and *all* future
> photographs you might make. <gg>
>
> -- John
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|