Sorry, I didn't mean to put down the Canon. I was just
posting from a review that I had read online. I have also
read lots of reviews where the users spoke very highly of
that scanner. In fact thats why I asked if Matt
had considered buying the Canonscan.
-Tim
> The Scan Elite will probably have 3.6, now I think of it. However,
> since, as I understand it, there is no agreed standard for measuring
> Dynamic Range, I am not sure how valid is a comparison.
>
> Chris
>
> At 20:50 +0000 29/10/02, suchismit@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> >Also,have you considered the Canon FS400US ? Though its
> >high on pixels its a little short on Dynamic range (3.4
> >vs Nikon's 3.6)
> >If you want to hear more good things about the Nikon,
> >CH Ling will be happy to tell you all about his
> >LS4000 :)
> >
>
> --
> <|_:-)_|>
>
> C M I Barker
> Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
> ?
> +44 (0)7092 251126
> mailto:imagopus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.threeshoes.co.uk
> ... a nascent photo library.
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|