| Subject: | RE: [OM] 50mm f2 vs 3.5 |
|---|---|
| From: | "Timpe, Jim" <Jim.Timpe@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 18 Nov 2002 14:14:10 -0800 |
Don't remember your telling of this little mishap. I sure hope everyone is OK afterward. Whiplash is wicked. And, I'm assuming that the bags blew in it. No facial scarring or blown eardrums, hopefully. -----Original Message----- From: AG Schnozz Somebody rear-ended it at about 35 mph and pushed it into the van in-front. $4900 later... < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OT cars, was 50mm f2 vs 3.5, Jamie Costello |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] OT Cars, Doggre |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 50mm f2 vs 3.5, Jamie Costello |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [OM] 50mm f2 vs 3.5, AG Schnozz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |