ML Archiv: Re: [OM] T-32 question

Subject:	Re: [OM] T-32 question
From:	siddiq <iddibhai@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Sun, 24 Nov 2002 17:05:44 -0800

11/24/2002 7:42:38 PM, Andy <chatschaturjan86@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

T32 is good down to 24mm wiht no falloff (one of the reason it's rated output 
seems weak ot competition which only goes down to 28 or 35)


/S
--
"We apologise for the inconvenience." 




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Zuiko 100mm f/2.8, Bryan Pilati Re: [OM] Zuiko 100mm f/2.8, Jim Brokaw Re: [OM] Zuiko 100mm f/2.8, Julian Davies Re: [OM] Zuiko 100mm f/2.8, John and Julie Ockman Re: [OM] Zuiko 100mm f/2.8, Bryan Pilati Re: [OM] Zuiko 100mm f/2.8, John and Julie Ockman Re: [OM] Zuiko 100mm f/2.8, Bryan Pilati [OM] T-32 question, Andy Re: [OM] T-32 question, siddiq <= Re: [OM] T-32 question, Clemente Colayco Re: [OM] T-32 question, Jim L'Hommedieu Re: [OM] Zuiko 100mm f/2.8, Roger D. Key

Previous by Date:	[OM] Re: Mind Bender, Stephen Troy
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Translation from Japanese needed...., C.H.Ling
Previous by Thread:	[OM] T-32 question, Andy
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] T-32 question, Clemente Colayco
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]