Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Digital Camera fraud/false advertising

Subject: Re: [OM] Digital Camera fraud/false advertising
From: "om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 10:34:19 -0500
OK, You've got me, to a certain extent.  My reply was a bit of a troll to
wind conversation up.

You've got unusually attentive girfriendS, IMO.  At least more than most of
the casual photo lookers that I come into contact with.

Keep on making those images.  But be careful of the multiple GF's  :-o

Skip



Original Message:
-----------------
From: Albert olympus@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 14:02:39 +0800
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] Digital Camera fraud/false advertising


Skip, that's just wrong!!  ;-)

My gf's friends ask, "How come your pictures are always so clear, and 
ours aren't?"  Well, first, as a shooter, my hands are pretty steady. 
 Also, lack of a shutter lag makes for good shots.  But a good Zuiko 
lens vs the plastic f8-f11 only lenses on the p&s's might be another 
reason also.  I took a few pics to show them however, STEADY HANDS make 
all the difference.  I used their p&s, and still got decent photos.

Regardless what lens you have in front, if the sensor is not sensitive 
enough, you won't get good quality pics.  I was reading a tech 
discussion about the "upper limits" of film as far as megapixel density. 
 Something like Fuji Provia, is upwards of 29 megapixels.  Without 
visually caused interpolation, that means 14 megapixels.  That's what 
the new Kodak will do, that means digital has caught up to film...  But 
trust me, Velvia does NOT EQUAL 2-3 megapixels!!

Hand me a loupe, and the difference is clear, regardless how good the 
printer is.

4-6 megapixels, you can't tell on a 4x6....  But 2-3, I can...easily.

Albert

om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

>On a 4x6, most people will see little difference between the two cameras,
>when the photos are shot outside with an average-lit subjects.  
>(blastphany, I know, I know)
>
>There IS a difference, but 990f the people won't see it, they only care
>about the subject.  This may be a better tactic and attitude for both the
>users, the consumers of the photos, and the sellers, in the end.  That
>doesn't mean that I endorse the advertising methodology, mind-you.
>
>(That not withstanding, I see a noticable difference between the 4x6's
>taken with my Contax T2 and those with a "normal" P&S.  So it can be seen.)
>
>Skip
>
>  
>



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz