At 09:06 AM 11/27/2002 +0800, Albert wrote:
Assuming I were to get a wunderbrick with AF for traveling, what do you
think would be a more convient lens if I only want to take one lens?
The Tokina 24-200mm, or Tamron's new 28-300XR? Of course that'd be for
the gf, I'd use the OM.
..
As always, the answer is "What do you want to shoot?" More on the low end?
If you rarely shoot beyond the 200mm, then don't get the 28-300! More is
not necessarily better! There has to be some compromises made. May be the
28-300 has smaller widest aperture. May be the images are not so great on
the high end. May be it's heavier or less well constructed. You ain't going
to get something for nothing :-)!
OTOH, if 200-300 is her cup of tea, then by all means....
// richard <http://www.imagecraft.com>
<http://www.dragonsgate.net/mailman/listinfo>
On-line orders, support, and listservers available on web site.
[ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous
replies in your msgs. ]
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|