Garth, some lovely shots. I should be tempted to crop the top half
of 6 and 7 to have a panorama of pure sand and sky. The flare rings
would add a focal point. No 1 would also look wonderful cropped in
the same way as an abstract - with sand at the bottom of the frame.
I am quite surprised that all the shots I have looked at on the
Internet have a decent brightness to them. I have my monitor's Gamma
set to 1.8 so I should have thought that it would make everything
looked washed out.
Chris
At 22:06 -0800 27/11/02, siddiq wrote:
11/27/2002 7:17:08 PM, Garth Wood <garth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
http://www.telusplanet.net/~garth/whitesands01.jpg (Zuiko 28/2.0,
overexposed two stops from meter reading)
http://www.telusplanet.net/~garth/whitesands02.jpg (as above)
http://www.telusplanet.net/~garth/whitesands03.jpg (as above)
http://www.telusplanet.net/~garth/whitesands04.jpg (Zuiko 100/2.0
w/Vivitar Macro Focusing 2X teleconverter, exposure as above)
http://www.telusplanet.net/~garth/whitesands05.jpg (Zuiko 28/2.0,
overexposed two stops)
http://www.telusplanet.net/~garth/whitesands06.jpg (as above)
http://www.telusplanet.net/~garth/whitesands07.jpg (as above)
what's causing the colour shift in 5 and 6? one is warmer than the
other. pretty impressive stuff, i've got a bottle of that sand, sure
looks odd, no doubt about it.
--
?
~~~~~ ><>
Chris Barker
Gamlingay, England
mailto:chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:cmib@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
