C.H.
I believe I selected the TCON-14B because it allowed the Sony lens to be
used throughout its entire range without vignetting. I felt that that was
more important than the extra .25X. Not sure though .......
Norm
----- Original Message -----
From: "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 6:58 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] Looking at digital
> The B300 may be a better choice as it has 1.7x mag vs the 1.45x of the
> Ton-14B, the weight of B300 is also around half the Ton-14B. I'm not sure
if
> works with the Sony 707 but most likely, you can search the web to see if
it
> is compatible. It is the most shout after tele-con for DC, new price is in
> the range of $220-250, I have sold a lot in ebay.
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Norman S. Nadel" <nsnadel@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 9:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [OM] Looking at digital
>
>
> > Clemente:
> >
> > TCON-14B = tele lens
> >
> > WCON-08B = wide
> >
> > I did a fair amount of research before buying the above. Both were
> > considered as having better glass than the Sony.
> >
> > No idea of which Oly cameras they fit. The WCON does say CAMEDIA on its
> > edge.
> >
> > Norm
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|