Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Mind Bender (intermediate focal length?)

Subject: Re: [OM] Mind Bender (intermediate focal length?)
From: "John A. Lind" <jlind@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 18:33:16 -0500
At 10:54 11/28/02, Joe Gwinn wrote:

I was thinking also of the lenses used on view cameras, where the field of view (that is, image circle) vastly exceeds the film size. Ditto, shift lenses for 35mm. So, I was looking for an algorithm that included only data that was true of all lenses, regardless of design, which leaves only focal length.

Cannot be done. A practical lens design has an "acceptance angle" independent of focal length which is the limiting factor for the FOV of the lens' _image_circle_. You are correct that technical camera lenses normally have an image circle diameter significantly larger than the film diagonal to allow for the adjustments moving the circle around across the film plane. It also means the 80mm Mamiya Sekor acceptance angle for an M645 must be much larger than the 85mm Zuiko acceptance angle for an OM.

However, when one speaks (or writes) of a system FOV, the limiting factor is the film dimension, if it's properly designed with the lens' image circle being larger (even if slightly more) than the film dimension. Even in 35mm small format and medium format systems, the image circle is usually a little larger than the film gate, especially for shorter lenses. Reason? It mitigates cos^4 falloff in the corners by placing the bulk of this falloff outside the film gate. The tradeoff is the extra light that doesn't end up in the photograph potentially bouncing around inside the lens and reducing contrast, or worse yet causing aperture flare.

-- John


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz