Well, there is another variable. The Kodak 100 was "scanned" using the ASF
destroy-your-negative-scanning-station. So possibly it's scanning and the
exposure saving were not top notch. The print looks pretty much the same as
the pics on the CD.
At 01:17 PM 12/5/2002 +0800, you wrote:
I think the different is the printing lab, which did a bad job.
C.H.Ling
"Richard F. Man" wrote:
>
> One interesting thing is I just got the roll of Provia 100F slide back, and
> it seems that the flash pictures look BETTER than the Kodak 100. Is it
> possible that the film can make a difference?
>
________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
// richard <http://www.imagecraft.com>
<http://www.dragonsgate.net/mailman/listinfo>
On-line orders, support, and listservers available on web site.
[ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous
replies in your msgs. ]
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|