Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] How many pixels in a 35mm film image - Pop Photo weighsin

Subject: Re: [OM] How many pixels in a 35mm film image - Pop Photo weighsin
From: "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 22:57:39 +0800
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Prosper" <japrosper@xxxxxxxxxxx>

>
> There is a fourth reason why transparencies are preferred to color
> negatives: contrast.  In a properly executed print, the contrast ratio
> between the brightest and darkest areas of the image are supposedly at
most
> 100:1.  With transparencies, this contrast ratio soars to 400:1!  I have
> long heard transparency enthusiasts brag about the "bottomless" blacks
> achievable with their medium of choice but virtually impossible with
prints.
>   The latitude with transparencies is much tighter, but the derived
contrast
> is supposedly what makes it all worthwhile.
>
> John
>

Are you talking about transparency itself? I think the contrast ratio is
4000:1 not 400:1.

C.H.Ling


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz