Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: comparison: Olympus 100/2.8 and Tamron 90/2.5

Subject: [OM] Re: comparison: Olympus 100/2.8 and Tamron 90/2.5
From: Jan Steinman <Jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 10:29:42 -0800
>From: "Jim L'Hommedieu" <lamadoo@xxxxxxxx>
>
>My thinking was that for table top photography (for ebay ads and puppies) I
>need something that brings me much closer than the Zuiko 100 /2.8.

Don't forget auto extension tubes!

While some zooms don't perform well with tubes, most primes will do a great job 
for anything but the most demanding, flat-field work.

I hate to see people "thrashing" their lens collection when a $30 set of tubes 
will solve their problems!

When buying third-party tubes, the biggest thing to look out for is clearance. 
A number of Zuikos extend back far enough that some third-party tubes won't 
work.

I have a set of Oly AND a set of Vivitar tubes that yield 63 different lengths 
to work with! (Of course, if I have to go over 65mm, I prefer the telescoping 
auto tube, which is an engineering marvel.)

Some complain that tubes are hard to work with, but surely no worse than 
teleconverters.

-- 
: Jan Steinman -- nature Transography(TM): <http://www.Bytesmiths.com>
: Bytesmiths -- artists' services: <http://www.Bytesmiths.com/Services>
: Buy My Step Van! <http://www.Bytesmiths.com/van>

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz